Is Indian Psecularism mother of world terrorism? (As this post was being written primarily in response to "Adulterating Spirituality.." hate campaign, another headline : Sri Sri Ravi Shankar gets threat from Tehreek-e-Taliban confirms my proposition!) Are Indian Psecular anti-Indian, intolerant of true Bharat & responsible for poor development of Bharat? How Indian Psecular are full of hate & how they are abusive towards true Bharat?
Smraat, Maharaja, Kings or their castes per se are not important as much their conduct & actions towards ordinary person identified with differentl words 'Hari'jan by Gandhi, Antodhay by modern humanists. Often synonymous with Siya-Ram and definitely without whom Siya-Ram of Tulsi's Ramcharit Manas, Brahm of Vedas, Atama (= self) of Krishna are meaningless. Both Ram & Ravana are otherwise just any other Kings, the latter Brahmin, whom former takes on with help-support of & for the sake of welfare of tribals & downtrodden including Shabbri. Definitely not for Plunder-Loot of 'Golden' Lanka : Janani Janam bhumashch Swargadapi Gariyasi.. (A quote from Valmiki Ramayana printed on cover page of every issue of 'Young India' in 1919 along with 'Vande Matram' and map of India with Tibet in north abutting China; but now a days only sung by 'conmmunal khakhi chaddi sanghis' in 'terrorist shakhas' (derogatory reference used by fake Gandhis' camp followers for nationalists !) )
'PK' should know Idol (=murti) be that of Ram lalla, Shiva or Bamian Budha is just a medium for an Idealization of SiyaRam that prevades all; not just human beings, nor just all living beings but even inanimate: SiyaRam-may sb jag jani, Karhun Pranam Jori.. It's for the first Interface of 'Creator' Who is inseparable from creation, essence of any Meditation technique. (especially indispensable for beginners & young for want of which many mis-step being dependent only on & hence prone to, at times, 'mischievous interpretaton' offered by corrupt 'Tejasvi Maharajs' so frequent among priests, monks, mullahs who may be Hindu, Muslin & Christian etc alike. Many unsuspecting Muslims & Christians parents are appalled when one fine morning they learn all of a sudden of their kids taking to guns & senseless killings, 'misguided' by a mullah or 'media' be it pk-Ghazni-Bollywood's or Hollywood's unreasonable/greedy approach to reason, sex or violence.
The same Tulsidas who sees SiyaRam in all amd thus clear about approach or vision for practical life or vyavharic satya (practical truth); when it comes to 'in his ritualistic Bhakti'; not to speak of just any other diety , 'pir', or 'mjar' for that matter, though admiring yet refuses to bow even before Vishnu if He appears before Him as Krishna & insists that he should come back with Bow & Arrow instead, the signs of Vishnu's Rama Incarnation! Mahatma Gandhi would show similar passion to defend his religious faith in this same article with the words. "the Hindu religion which I certainly prize above all other religions.."(see figure 'no:5' below) latter on one hand & on the other be equitable in his day to day dealings..!
This question whether 'Sri Sri And Ramdev: Adulterating Spirituality With Politics?', in present context can be best answered in the words of Mahatma Gandhi himself that came as a reply when he faced similar character assassination bid at the hands of appalled imperial propaganda machinery. Much the same way the desperate Modi opponents with the taint of graft, all round failure & no vision for aspiring millions are trying every trick and making hollow howl on non-issues.
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre & Rowlatt Act were the reasons wounded nation & Mahatma were busy laying the nitty-gritty of the movement to challenge the might of British. Mahatma was posed the same desperate question, "Mr. Gandhi has the reputation of a saint but it seems that the politician in him often dominates his decisions.."(see figure 'no:1' below). Gandhi described it in detail in Young India (published by Mahatma Gandhi himself to circulate Swaraj related literature for countrymen. The said article titled 'Neither Saint nor Politician' is penned by Mahatma Gandhi himself, is on page-2, Young India, dated 12th May, 1920 and is being reproduced here as it is (see figures no:1,2,3,4,5,6 below) :
no: 1
no: 3
no: 4
source : https://www.gandhiheritageportal.org/
Yes, One may say 'Neither Saint nor Politician' or 'Both Saint and A Politician' or a 'Sant Sipahi'; I would say 'Saint need not be a Politician' in order to 'justify' his addressing national issues. Rather howls of "The Politician dominating in A Reputed Saint" or 'Saints Adulterating Spirituality With Politics' by Colonial British or their Manas-Putr ('Black Heir') in Neo-Colonial Indian Psecular backed by Petro-Dolar/crony-capitalist fed Media confirms the despair in latter's camp on being exposed 'nude'. What use all spiritual knowledge if most non-voilent and benevolent 'gau'(cow) katati rahe aur mahatma smadhi me mgan rahen! I'll conclude this post with;
Indian Psecular's asking, 'Sri Sri And Ramdev: Adulterating Spirituality With Politics?' is not new. Innumerable seekers of 'Truth' saints (or '...') have always been facing such accusations. Socrate, Galileo, in west (many more actually) are famous examples. Mediveal & Modern India's history is replete with numerous instances of lusty Invaders/rulers, unfamiliar with traditions of the land, not just questioning the authority of spiritual figures but subjecting them to cruel treatment & latters' often having to sacrifice their lives for the sake of the truth & welfare of humanity. In this land Ram follows Vashishtha,Vishvamitra, & Valmiki; Arjuna follows Krishna & Shivaji follows Smath Guru Ramdas etc.
Smraat, Maharaja, Kings or their castes per se are not important as much their conduct & actions towards ordinary person identified with differentl words 'Hari'jan by Gandhi, Antodhay by modern humanists. Often synonymous with Siya-Ram and definitely without whom Siya-Ram of Tulsi's Ramcharit Manas, Brahm of Vedas, Atama (= self) of Krishna are meaningless. Both Ram & Ravana are otherwise just any other Kings, the latter Brahmin, whom former takes on with help-support of & for the sake of welfare of tribals & downtrodden including Shabbri. Definitely not for Plunder-Loot of 'Golden' Lanka : Janani Janam bhumashch Swargadapi Gariyasi.. (A quote from Valmiki Ramayana printed on cover page of every issue of 'Young India' in 1919 along with 'Vande Matram' and map of India with Tibet in north abutting China; but now a days only sung by 'conmmunal khakhi chaddi sanghis' in 'terrorist shakhas' (derogatory reference used by fake Gandhis' camp followers for nationalists !) )
'PK' should know Idol (=murti) be that of Ram lalla, Shiva or Bamian Budha is just a medium for an Idealization of SiyaRam that prevades all; not just human beings, nor just all living beings but even inanimate: SiyaRam-may sb jag jani, Karhun Pranam Jori.. It's for the first Interface of 'Creator' Who is inseparable from creation, essence of any Meditation technique. (especially indispensable for beginners & young for want of which many mis-step being dependent only on & hence prone to, at times, 'mischievous interpretaton' offered by corrupt 'Tejasvi Maharajs' so frequent among priests, monks, mullahs who may be Hindu, Muslin & Christian etc alike. Many unsuspecting Muslims & Christians parents are appalled when one fine morning they learn all of a sudden of their kids taking to guns & senseless killings, 'misguided' by a mullah or 'media' be it pk-Ghazni-Bollywood's or Hollywood's unreasonable/greedy approach to reason, sex or violence.
The same Tulsidas who sees SiyaRam in all amd thus clear about approach or vision for practical life or vyavharic satya (practical truth); when it comes to 'in his ritualistic Bhakti'; not to speak of just any other diety , 'pir', or 'mjar' for that matter, though admiring yet refuses to bow even before Vishnu if He appears before Him as Krishna & insists that he should come back with Bow & Arrow instead, the signs of Vishnu's Rama Incarnation! Mahatma Gandhi would show similar passion to defend his religious faith in this same article with the words. "the Hindu religion which I certainly prize above all other religions.."(see figure 'no:5' below) latter on one hand & on the other be equitable in his day to day dealings..!
This question whether 'Sri Sri And Ramdev: Adulterating Spirituality With Politics?', in present context can be best answered in the words of Mahatma Gandhi himself that came as a reply when he faced similar character assassination bid at the hands of appalled imperial propaganda machinery. Much the same way the desperate Modi opponents with the taint of graft, all round failure & no vision for aspiring millions are trying every trick and making hollow howl on non-issues.
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre & Rowlatt Act were the reasons wounded nation & Mahatma were busy laying the nitty-gritty of the movement to challenge the might of British. Mahatma was posed the same desperate question, "Mr. Gandhi has the reputation of a saint but it seems that the politician in him often dominates his decisions.."(see figure 'no:1' below). Gandhi described it in detail in Young India (published by Mahatma Gandhi himself to circulate Swaraj related literature for countrymen. The said article titled 'Neither Saint nor Politician' is penned by Mahatma Gandhi himself, is on page-2, Young India, dated 12th May, 1920 and is being reproduced here as it is (see figures no:1,2,3,4,5,6 below) :
no: 1
no: 2
First, starting with the reasons as to why he attached importance to slanderous campaign, amidst more important work of Swaraj he says,
"..As a rule I do not notice criticism of me or my methods except when thereby I acknowledge a mistake or enforce still further the principles criticised, I have double reason for noticing the extract. For, not only do I hope further to elucidate the principles I hold dear, but I want to show my regard for the author of the criticism whom I know and I have admired for many years.."
(see figure 'no:3' below)
no: 3
Out of humility Gandhi rejects the word 'saint' to describe him: "ruled out of present life" and quite humbly,"as he knows his limitations, makes mistakes". This also shows his regard for saints: "too sacred a word to be applied to anybody". Yet defending his right to be religious. He portrays himself to be a common man who in his attempt to live in peace and struggle with over-dominating politics, which he likens to "a snake" and "a bellowing storm howling round him"; is experimenting with truth by introducing religion into politics.(see figure no:4)
For fake Gandhi followers including a powelful section of media yoga, yogaday, yog-gurus are communal whom they call names. When nation is leading the whole world, fake Gandhis lead Indian Psecular by flying to undisclosed foreign destination(s) for holidays! Often we hear fancy dress means not real, hiding the reality. Here we see fancy name 'Gandhi' just good for votes but in essence hiding the truth the real identity.
no: 4
no: 5
no: 5
no: 6
source : https://www.gandhiheritageportal.org/
Yes, One may say 'Neither Saint nor Politician' or 'Both Saint and A Politician' or a 'Sant Sipahi'; I would say 'Saint need not be a Politician' in order to 'justify' his addressing national issues. Rather howls of "The Politician dominating in A Reputed Saint" or 'Saints Adulterating Spirituality With Politics' by Colonial British or their Manas-Putr ('Black Heir') in Neo-Colonial Indian Psecular backed by Petro-Dolar/crony-capitalist fed Media confirms the despair in latter's camp on being exposed 'nude'. What use all spiritual knowledge if most non-voilent and benevolent 'gau'(cow) katati rahe aur mahatma smadhi me mgan rahen! I'll conclude this post with;
Janani jane to Bhakt jn
Ya data ya shur
Nahi toh janani banjh bhale
Vyatha ghtayo nur
Bhakt doesn/t mean Chetan Bhagat @chetan_bhagat
#ftii
— Satya (@Satya48821934) July 11, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment